Neil.

You opinion is your own. What does it mean when you say my work is goobly-gook? You speak as if I'm alone in some dark room. Please, must you insult the intelligence of these people? There is a significant size group that reads what you say and know you speak out of ignorance and spite. You 'see' with narrow vision. If what someone is doing does not fit your mindset, it must be goobly-gook. Fine.

Did you know that anyone can make the kind of statements you make without any basis of fact? Sure you do, as do we. You just have to say things like "everyone hates you in the industry" and hope you can convince as many fools as possible. Meanwhile, reality is that industry folk continue to seek a business alliance with me, most I turn down.

It is so hard for you to realize that I have been in this business for many years now because I'm the real deal. No, prejudice and dogmatic views will prevent reason to enter your mind. So be it. You and your 'small' group of critics (made to look larger by using multiple aliases) have been with me for many, many years calling for my doom. Yet, we prosper in spite of your preaching hellfire upon us.

But let's discuss you now. We have seen you go from heavy drinker posting while drunk (cursing etc.) to stating you have been 'saved' and then making hellfire judgments upon others. Heck, you've been judging me for a long time although you should know better than to judge anyone, especially someone you don't even know.

It's a proud person that cannot admit that he simply does not understand something.

Now to address another ignorant statement you made. This one is about being a 'publishing CTA'.

Frank Taucher went to bat against the Feds on the issue or registering publisher's as CTA's. This went to court and Frank Taucher won after spending over $100K on this matter. This is freedom of press. Since we are NOT trading other people's accounts, there is no reason to register. At the time Frank was fighting this in court, I was registered as a CTA. When he won and it was stated we no longer needed to, why bother? It didn't increase our business being a CTA, just increased our workload and costs. What for? So we can appease someone like you that can't see the difference between a publisher and a money manager? Seriously, we don't want that kind of customer anyway, cause you aren't grounded.

Go cry to the Wall Street Journal writers that they should be 'publishing CTA'. Hound the Investor's Daily column writers and cry foul for they are not P-CTA's. Go tell the respected Frank Taucher that he shouldn't have fought for the right to publish without being registered as a CTA. I can assure you that he has MORE friends in high places in this industry than you'll ever have...and a lot more respect.

Have you ever commanded $5000 a seat in a seminar? No? And yet you think you are in position to make claims about my work. Laughable if it weren't so pitiful.

Perhaps someday you will really see the light and stop your false accusations about others.

Regards,

-R